Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Welcome to Volume 6 of The Marocharim Experiment. This blog is authored and maintained by Marocharim, the self-professed antichrist of new media.



Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Marocharim is a 21-year-old college senior from the University of the Philippines Baguio, majoring in Social Anthropology and has a minor in Political Science. He lives with his parents, his brother and his sister in Baguio City - having been born and raised there all his life. He is the author of three book-versions of The Marocharim Experiment.

Most of his time is spent at school, where he can be found in the UP Baguio Library reading or scribbling notes, and sometimes hanging out with his friends or by himself in the kiosks, or the main lobby. During his spare time, he continues writing. When not in school he hangs out with his friends, or takes long walks around Baguio City to, as he puts it, "get lost."

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

The Marocharim Experiment Volume I: The Trial of Another Mind, Subject to Disclosure is Available Now

The Marocharim Experiment Volume II: The Nevermind Chronicles is Available Now

The Marocharim Experiment Volume III: The Sentence Construction of Reality is Available Now

TAG/E-MAIL FOR COPIES


Image hosted by Photobucket.com
   

<< September 2007 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30



Image hosted by Photobucket.com




Image hosted by Photobucket.com

[Friendster]
[Gmail Contact]
[Yahoo!Mail Contact]

Listed on BlogShares

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

"The Marocharim Experiment," "Marocharim" and all the contents in this online web log are the sole intellectual properties of Marck Ronald Rimorin and are protected by existing copyleft laws. Any attempt to copy and/or reproduce the contents of this site, either through electronic or printed means, must be accompanied with the express written consent of the author.


If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:



rss feed



September 28, 2007
Death by (Friendster) Degrees XIII

< number 13 >

   Shoutouts to Krissa and Camille, who have just submitted their final thesis draft.  They're working on something pertaining to juvenile delinquency, and here I am still on draft mode.  My thesis is far from complete.  Owing to the way I'm writing my thesis, my adviser takes things chapter-by-chapter: some corrections, explanations and elaborations here and there, and then I stop.  It's the kind of mercy I have to accord myself if I'm going to finish, graduate, and get the hell out of school.

   But every so often there's that nagging thought of committing some mistake where I re-read and rewrite entire passages in some chapter.  It's the kind of paranoia that comes with the thought of delivering my thesis in a colloquium next semester or worse, an academic conference.  It's the kind of paranoia that comes with your thesis being the subject of some talk in the faculty room.  My framework is synthetic, not analytical: it is extremely fragile.  One wrong move and I'll be in hot water... my friends know how much I dislike hot drinks.

   My parents don't understand why I subject myself to such extremes of working late into the wee hours of the morning to the point of overexertion, but I do understand their concern.  Like my framework, I am extremely fragile: physically, mentally, emotionally.  I can't count how many times I found myself in the verge of tears in front of my computer looking over profile after profile, poring over book after book, making sense of it all.  Whatever shred of sanity is left in me is something I put into my work as if it meant life and death for me.

   My dad, in particular, is getting angrier every weekend he comes home, every time he sees me working under self-imposed pressure.  I always thought I'd see some pride in his eyes when he sees me exerting some degree of diligence, but I have to listen to his angry rantings at 1:00 AM Sunday.  I don't know what it takes to regain my dad's respect and good favor, but I've long reminded myself that this thesis is not that which will make my father proud.

   I look upon my work as something special: a ticket to the train of opportunity.  I work my ass off because I haven't really worked a single day in my undergraduate career.  I want to establish myself in my field: it's not that I look down on call center agents or what, but because I believe I am capable of being more than a failure.  My thesis is my penance for the grievous sin of not looking after my family when ideally, I should be in a position right now to do so.  It is an act of contrition for underestimating myself for so long, not doing what I can do, limiting myself to what I considered "actual" about myself.

   I find myself in one of the strangest positions imaginable for a "delinquent:" the chance to be a legitimate social scientist.  The chance to put the name my father gave me into the annals of history.  I won't accept that I'm at the losing end, and I refuse to have my hands on the short sword on the draw.

   Right now, my work is paying small dividends: not in me being called a scholar, but my adviser just nominated my work for "Best Thesis" awards for qualitative analysis, which is the hardest thing you could do in my discipline.  If I really am what I write, I just, in my friend Mhik's words, "rocked" CSS.

   The time is now... for me to start working on the most tedious part of my thesis so far: Chapter Ten.


Posted at Friday, September 28, 2007 by marocharim
Revolt!  

Inventing Corruption

< hmmm... >

   I thought that the Chinese had enough problems with toys containing lead, buns filled with cardboard, and a Beijing food stall selling horse meat.  Now, one of the luminaries of the Philippine academe claimed - and apologized for - China "inventing" corruption.

   That luminary is no less than Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago.  Say what you will about Miriam's average rating (78%) in the 1968 Bar, but she is one of the greatest minds of her generation (noting that she was Elly "Spike" Pamatong's classmate).  Miriam is also known for her mercurial temper: following the annoying debating debacle in the Senate regarding the ZTE deal, she said: "China invented civilization in the East, but as well it invented corruption for all human civilization."

   Like Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, Christian Bautista, and Vanessa Hudgens before her, she apologized.  These days are ripe for mea culpa's of all sorts: the President apologizing for calling "a COMELEC commissioner," Christian apologizing for missing a few phrases of the National Anthem, and Vanessa apologizing for those nude shots that spread like meningococcemia all over the Internet.  The common denominator is that they were all caused by a "lapse in judgment."  "Lapses in judgment" are made by plebeians: not a Miriam Santiago.

   I have Chinese blood in me: my maternal grandfather is Chinese.  I should be outraged, but Miriam has a point.  In Miriam's defense, if you invent civilization, you would effectively have invented corruption.  It's basic anthropology: when bands of hunter-gatherers come together in a more complex form that is agriculture, the power relations become more sophisticated.  Society is now divided between "haves" and "have nots."  As agricultural societies started to develop politics, barbarism gave way to an ordering of society based on slavery, fiefdoms, and having social inequalities compared to the relative equality of barbarism.  Any anthropologist worth his or her salt would know this: it's a banal reading of Lewis Henry Morgan.  Or perhaps the Civilization games.

   I say, hooray for corruption.  Civilization is built around corruption.  Without corruption, we would still be stuck picking berries.  Let us rejoice and bask in the light of being corrupt, sing the "Kumbaya," and shoot ourselves on New Year's Day.


Posted at Friday, September 28, 2007 by marocharim
Revolt!  

September 27, 2007
Licking Lead

< hmmm... >

   I grew up on "Thomas the Tank Engine," so I'm definitely not surprised that toy companies are recalling toy trains that contain lead paint.  It's a syllogistic fallacy: toy trains are made of metal, lead is a metal, so toy trains contain lead.

   To be honest, I'm getting quite annoyed with toy recalls: maybe the elves from the International Standards Organization have done a quality check on Santa's Workshop, denied him an ISO-9000 certification because of lead paint in his inventory, and there will be no new toys for kids these days.  Too bad, kids: Santa has a longer subpoena than his Christmas list.

   I was even more flabbergasted when "Tickle Me Elmo" was recalled from toy stores because of lead content.  Do plush dolls of some potential murdering Muppet contain lead?  What exactly do you paint in an Elmo doll?

   Now if toy companies start selling Lego bricks made purely out of lead, that's a different story altogether.  Because of these toy-recall things, I'm starting to believe that we should blame stupid kids themselves for licking their toys.  I mean, my nieces and nephews don't lick their toy cars, dolls, action figures, or Disney DVD's.  Sure, I've seen them get gashes from riding small bikes on a rocky backyard.  Not that I'm anti-American or anything, but is there something uniquely American about toy-licking?

   Heck, I grew up around completely unsafe toys: spiders in an empty box of matches, tops made out of guava wood and a roofing nail, plastic "Dinosaur Eggs" that catch grime and cobwebs when thrown onto a classroom ceiling, "Magic Capsules" made out of pharmaceutical gelatin and a small steel ball.  I played with toys that apparently "corrupt my morals:" rubber cigarettes, toy fetuses, fake vomit, plastic cow dung.  An entire tower of Zaks and Legos collapsed on me in the Guidance Office, and I cried because three hours of building went to waste.  And no, I didn't lick a single toy.

   But for all the apparent joy that there is in licking toys, I think that protecting our children from every danger there is in the world is not only impossible, but futile.  Kids will be kids: they will always be in danger.  The bubble we surround our children in will only serve to make them devalue the kind of fun that is in dangerous territory.  The reality of the world is that it is fraught with more dangerous things than lead: kidnapping murdering pedophiles, for example.  The safety of our children lies in them discovering how dangerous life can be.  A kid will get sick not only because of licking a lead toy, but also by eating too much sweets, horseplay, inhaling pollution, and even living life.

   Risk, if I may say so myself, makes for a really useful engine.  Dammit, watch your "Thomas and Friends."


Posted at Thursday, September 27, 2007 by marocharim
(2) vomitted  

Place

< hmmm... >

   The idea of "place" has been bugging me for the past few weeks that it has sort of become a nagging issue for me.  It's an issue of people having no place in a world that is their own.

   I read somewhere that if you put all the people in the world with a comfortable distance between them, they'll fit in an island in Hawaii, with enough room for portable toilets and snack stands.  Imagine that: six billion people standing on a single island.  All this talk about "crowding" is quite overrated, then: if you can give every person on Earth a single spot on a Hawaiian island, then everyone would have a place.

   The issue of "place" found me on the school gates today, with younger acquaintances complaining that thanks to a new "no smoking" rule, they no longer have places, at least underneath the shade of the trees in the relatively distant woods.  My complaining, though, is not the grieving kind: I understand that the policy is an application of the laws of the land.  But finding so many people lined up on the curb has me sympathizing: not because I'm a smoker, but because I understand the feeling of having no place.

   I start to see the world not as a world of places, but as a world of near-complete transience.  We move and live in places we do not own (and cannot call our own) because we have no place.  Place is, fundamentally, a point in space, but some of us don't even have the benefit of having a point in the vast expanse of space.  The poor, the displaced, the dispossessed, the disenfranchised: they are those who are either out of place, or have no place.

   The "demand for space" is fundamentally a demand of a place: to me, place defines identity.  Identity is constructed in place: of living here, of working here, of being here.  To demand place is to demand somewhere where one can construct and articulate identity: no individual exists apart from space, and all actions take place in some point in space.  Thanks to technology, we can create spaces in the Internet (like MySpace or Friendster), but what of this real world where some of us don't have spaces of our own?

   I see it everywhere: the barong-barong, the street food stall, the piece of cardboard where a beggar kneels on the sidewalk, is effectively one's place in a place he or she does not own.  I've seen the vast expanse of Hacienda Luisita from bus trips and from the time I went there, and the sugarcane haciendas of Negros from the window of an airplane.  I see big mansions, exclusive condominiums, villages and estates and ask myself the question of place... one I'll be asking myself for a long, long time.


Posted at Thursday, September 27, 2007 by marocharim
Revolt!  

September 26, 2007
Morphin' Time

< i'm going to get flak for this... who cares >

   I wrote on the new GMA-7 series "Zaido" before, but that was before I actually watched it.  But one episode of "Zaido" is enough for me to hurl: not only did it urinate (figuratively) on "Shaider" and Star Trek, but add a ripped-off version of Zordon to it and yes, it kind of reminded me of a bastardized version of "Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers."  Just so you know, Dennis Trillo reminded me of Tommy.

   While we're on the subject of the Power Rangers, I didn't follow the series as much: I never watched an episode of "Dino Thunder."  For all intents and purposes, the Ranger I loathe most is Tommy, the most popular Ranger of them all.  The guy can do practically everything, became three Rangers (Green, White, and Red), and he's always the hero.  My favorite among the original Power Rangers is Billy, because he represents my peeps just fine.

   While I'm more of a "Transformers" fan (not the disgraceful but beautiful-looking version made by Michael Bay), I kind of liked morphing of Mastodon, Pterodactyl, Triceratops, Saber-Toothed Tiger, and Tyrranosaurus.  I still don't understand why Saber-Toothed Tiger (Yellow Ranger's Zord) is a "Dinozord," since the prehistoric animal is not a dinosaur, much less a reptile.  The Thunderzords, though, were way cooler: combining the Mega Thunderzord, Tor and Pyramidas together formed a badass robot, but it's not cool enough compared to the imaginary and hypothetical combination you can get from combining any two Autobots, or Grimlock.

   OK, here are the lyrics:

*      *      *

They've got a power and a force that you've never seen before
They've got the ability to morph and to even up the score
No one will ever take them down
The power lies on their side

Go, go, Power Rangers
Go, go, Power Rangers
Go, go, Power Rangers
You, Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers

They know the fate of the world is lying in their hands
They know to only use their weapons for defense
No one will ever take them down
The power lies on their side

Go, go, Power Rangers
Go, go, Power Rangers
Go, go, Power Rangers
You, Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers

No one will ever take them down
The power lies on their side

Go, go, Power Rangers
Go, go, Power Rangers
Go, go, Power Rangers
You, Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers

Go, go, Power Rangers...


Posted at Wednesday, September 26, 2007 by marocharim
Revolt!  

September 25, 2007
Death by (Friendster) Degrees XII

< oh boy >

   I'm settled for meriting an "INC" for my thesis subject this semester: it's not that all my hard labor summed up in a 122-page draft is in vain, it's just that I just haven't gone far enough in six months of thesis work.  Like I said before, the prudent thing to do would be to type up my conclusions, but I don't like to look back at myself a few years from now and have my regrets for submitting a half-baked thesis.

   As overkill as my thesis already is, I've only gone so far as to deal with only three factors of a typical Friendster profile, and I still have three more to go.  I'm not going to proclaim that the sun will stand still and I can finish everything in the span of two weeks: I'm allowing myself give or take six weeks to finish it all.  My parents don't understand why I'm so meticulous with my thesis that I work until 3 AM to finish what I can in a night, but what drives me to do so is the kind of patience I wish I had in my younger days.  I'm no longer doing what I do for a sense of pride, but a sense of purpose.  Yes, I do believe that my work will be my "deposit" for my ticket into the academe and into the intellectual community, but I want to give myself the opportunity to make up and compensate for my shortcomings in my career as an undergraduate student.

   From the thesis front: my suspicions have been confirmed that I'm not only dealing with a sociological problem, but a philosophical problem as well.  To be exact, the problem of self is an ontological question: a question of being.  My ontological paranoia, at least, has been appeased by confronting my problem in terms of "the virtual:" the possibility of becoming, and not the "virtual reality" of the colloquial sense.  Such a "revelation" has been made possible when I was at home reading Anti-Oedipus by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari.  I'm not going to disclose anything yet, but my analytical Frankenstein monster is now becoming ever more coherent.  I'm not divulging anything outright just yet.

   Because yesterday was a slump brought about by weeks of fatigue and exhaustion, I decided to change my color schemes from red accents to blue accents.  This is yet another one of my anal-retentive compulsions to make a suave-looking paper.  I also decided to format my paper according to the standards of academic writing by resizing fonts into 12-point typeface, which blew up my draft into somewhere around 174 pages, plus a new chapter.

   You guessed it: I'm not stopping there.


Posted at Tuesday, September 25, 2007 by marocharim
Revolt!  

Ahmadinejad-ed

< hmmm... >

   I was watching CNN at the wee hours of the morning to listen to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad speak at Columbia University.  This has been the subject of much debate in the academe: should Mr. Ahmadinejad be allowed to speak in an American university in the interest of free speech, when the United States government has explicitly considered Mr. Ahmadinejad a "terrorist?"

   Personally, I do not agree with whatever a hectoring poltroon like Mr. Ahmadinejad has to say, but I defend his right to say whatever he has to say in a public forum, even if it is in an American university as prestigious as Columbia.  About a year ago, a similar incident happened in UP Diliman, when former PNP Chief Hermogenes Esperon was pelted with eggs and mud following an speech he gave on political killings.  The reason for throwing stuff at Gen. Esperon was simple (minded): it was in the interest of protest to pelt him with eggs and mud because of "political repression."

   Yes, I believe Mr. Ahmadinejad is a Holocaust-denier, an Islamist supremacist, an anti-Semite, a man intolerant of gays, a guy whose idea of "root causes" can be associated with a literal - not analogical or metaphorical - potato.  The American people need not welcome Mr. Ahmadinejad, much less give him the red-carpet treatment, but he is free to speak his mind in a free country.  The American people can be intolerant to Mr. Ahmadinejad's empty pontificating, but the least that can be expected for a nation based on the very canons of free speech is for people to pretend to listen to him.  It's like listening to your Calculus professor: pretending to listen will at least save your arse through a perfect attendance record.

   New York City Council Speaker Christie C. Quinn says that by giving Mr. Ahmadinejad a forum, he will only "spew more hatred and more venom out here to the world."  I say, he should go on ahead and do his spewing: the critical minds of Columbia University know better than to passively accept whatever Mr. Ahmadinejad has to say.  As my good friend Jamir Ocampo said back in the day when we used to be in the same debate team in high school, Mr. Ahmadinejad is nothing more than an empty can.  But denying figurative empty cans the chance to resonate in a public forum is, in effect, empty judgment.


Posted at Tuesday, September 25, 2007 by marocharim
Revolt!  

September 24, 2007
A Teacher's Voyage

< hmmm... >

   I was hanging outside the school gates awhile ago when my old third year high school teacher, Ma'am Susan Sagisi, pulled over the side of the road.  Ma'am Susan happens to be one of my favorite teachers: one of the best reasons I could think of right now is that she's the only Math teacher who has had the patience to pull me out of the rut of high school algebra.  The sad thing is that she's leaving for New Mexico tomorrow night.  What made the scene even more pathetic is that even if I felt the tears welling from my eyes at the thought of seeing her go, I never really got the chance to bid her a proper goodbye.

   Ma'am Susan, like every other high school teacher I know, is going to the States to seek greener pastures.  It's a damned shame that she had to go even if she's already a tenured head teacher in Baguio City National High School, but the realities of economics has to sink in somewhere at one time or another.  I can understand that some of my professors in college are millionaires owing to their position in the academe, but high school is different.  Nobility is not a practical utility these days: when you have bills to pay, children to put through college, and dreams to chase after, you need to be more pragmatic.

   I'm having second thoughts about teaching, if only because I also have obligations to my family and dreams to chase after.  Quite a number of my friends say that I'll make a good teacher (except for kindergarten and primary school) one day, but even at my age, I have to be more practical about my career choices.  I have family to look after, and this means selling myself off to the highest employment bidder whenever I can.  It's just the way the world works.

   Right now, I'm trying to visualize a Math class in City High in the absence of Ma'am Susan: I'm thinking along the lines of pedagogical sadists who demand a numerical answer to a polynomial with nothing but variables.  Teachers who would demand that you vanish into thin air and never be heard from again even in a two-letter-and-smiley text message.  But at the same time, I'm thinking of teachers who, in the absence of US visas and placement deposits, sell ice drop, polvoron and tocino to their students, threatening a failed mark.  I'm thinking of teachers burdened not only by lesson plans and class records on working hours, but the duties of family on off-hours.  I'm thinking of the noble profession of teaching being reduced into nothing more than a rat race, where the winner is still a rat who happens to teach.

   I know: this general theme has been articulated to the point of dramatic abuse in Philippine cinema, where you would have an Alessandra de Rossi or a Maricel Soriano play a teacher, and then the whole class would be forced to write a movie review for Filipino class.  But it happens all too often: the irony and ignominy of it is to be found in the classic example of a Filipino teaching English to Americans.  I do wish that Ma'am Susan will find a sense of purpose in New Mexico, outside of the sense of purpose that comes with economic necessities.

   But I can't help but to look at things on my terms: what a class reunion would be like without her fleeting, momentary, Cinderella-like presence.  I can't help but to look far into my future and probably see myself in a similar position as she does: a dream of white picket fences, dollars, and macaroni-and-cheese dinners.  I have to make some weighing between my own ideals of patriotism and my own pragmatic economics, to sign travel documents and get my real dreams fulfilled some place else outside of this country.

   Like everyone else, I am definitely going to miss her.


Posted at Monday, September 24, 2007 by marocharim
(1) vomitted  

September 23, 2007
Tubes and Highways

< hmmm... >

   I remember one time when US Senator Ted Stevens once referred to the Internet as, "It's not a dumptruck... it's a series of tubes."  But a couple of nights ago, during the Senate hearing on the national broadband network deal, I heard Senator Richard Gordon say, and correct me if I'm wrong, "The Internet is just like a highway."

   Personally, I think our august and esteemed Senators should refrain from defining and talking about things they obviously do not know.  Much of the ZTE hearing revolved around people wanting to know what "broadband" is, how the Internet works, and Senator Rodolfo Biazon asking if Smart has a wider coverage than Globe.  After a few days of trying to understand what the Senate committee was actually talking about, it turns out (and this is just my opinion) that they understand the Internet in terms of P20-an-hour cafés with broadband... ah, so that's why it's so corrupt.  Never mind that Joey de Venecia III is a marijuana user, that FG Mike Arroyo demanded that Joey "back off," or that, from my understanding the government can't make a contract with telecoms... heck, who understands anything about this ZTE deal?

   I expected the younger generation of Senators - in that of Francis Escudero, the Cayetano siblings, or Juan Miguel Zubiri - to come to the rescue of the older Senators who are still trapped in the days of Telex and save the Senate from the destruction brought about by their ignorance of the Internet.  But no: they were too busy implicating or not implicating President Arroyo in the dubious deal.

   Nope, I'm not going to spend time explaining what the Internet is to the Senate.  If old people want to think of the Internet in terms of dumptrucks, tubes, highways, or whatever other metaphor they can think of, I'm fine with that.  After all, the Senate can start investigating about this "Internet" thing we speak of.


Posted at Sunday, September 23, 2007 by marocharim
Revolt!  

September 22, 2007
Death by (Friendster) Degrees XI

< oooh, eleven >

   First of all, my congratulations to my very good friends Jeronimo Poyaoan and Jezele Lester Esguerra, who have worked so hard and can now confidently put the title "Engineer" before their names.

*      *      *

   Because of a slump in thesis-writing activity, I decided to follow my friend Tano's lead and write endnotes to my thesis chapters.  The reason why I chose to write endnotes is because I needed to qualify myself: suffice to say, I did a lot in the way of qualifying.  Needless to say, my "synthetic approach" has led me to do a lot of endnote-related explanation.

   Like many social scientists, I have this particular paranoia about the "passé."  Since I'm planning to submit my paper to an overseas conference, I feel the need to do a bit of ass-kissing by using more "contemporary" thinkers, following the suggestion of some of my teachers.  For all intents and purposes of pulling rabbits out of hats, though, I could do worse than to go back to the "traditional" thought.  If I'm going to talk about "virtual communities," I'm going to have to talk about "community" itself.  And nobody talks about "community" better than sociology's grand old man himself: Emilé Durkheim.

   This is one of those days where I wished I paid more attention to my classical theory class.  The triumvirate of sociological thought revolves around an understanding of three people: Durkheim, Max Weber, and Karl Marx.  To be perfectly honest, my weakest point is Durkheim.  I could probably be forgiven for having lapses with Weber or having abused Marx in my younger days, but not so Durkheim: for all intents and purposes, Durkheim "invented" sociology.

   Yup, my theory professor would probably drop her Philip Morris, cut off a branch from the learning tree, and proceed to give me the beating of my life if I ever make a single mistake in an interpretation of Durkheim.  Besides, the chapter is due on Monday.


Posted at Saturday, September 22, 2007 by marocharim
Revolt!  

Next Page